Ford Ranger 2006 vs Mazda BT-50 2006

 
Ford Ranger
2006 - 2010
Mazda BT-50
2006 - 2008
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.5 Diesel
Petrol engines (Ford Ranger) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mazda BT-50) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.

Performance

Power: 143 HP143 HP
Torque: 209 NM330 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds12.5 seconds
Ford Ranger and Mazda BT-50 have the same engine power, but Ford Ranger torque is 121 NM less than Mazda BT-50.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data8.9
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 203 mm (8 inches)207 mm (8.1 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 5.08 m5.08 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.75 m1.76 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger and Mazda BT-50 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 1500 litresno data
Turning diameter: no data12.5 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data3`030
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 7200no data
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda BT-50 has
    • has 4x4 drive
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv