Ford Ranger 2006 vs Nissan Navara 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 75 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 170 NM less than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine: The V9X engine stands out due to its unusual 65-degree V-angle. It features a lightweight cast-iron block, aluminum cylinder heads with hydraulic lifters, a variable geometry turbocharger, and a chain-driven timing ... More about Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is smaller. Ford Ranger is 32 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`010 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |