Ford Ranger 2006 vs Mazda CX-9 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 207 HP | 273 HP | |
| Torque: | 323 NM | 367 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 66 HP less power than Mazda CX-9, whereas torque is 44 NM less than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 12.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 76 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-9 2009: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 203 mm (8 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Ranger is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1500 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2852 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`062 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |