Ford Ranger 2006 vs Mazda CX-9 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 207 HP | 263 HP | |
| Torque: | 323 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 56 HP less power than Mazda CX-9, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 12.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 76 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-9 2007: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
| Ford Ranger and Mazda CX-9 are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1500 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2852 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |