Ford Ranger 2015 vs Ford Ranger 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Ranger 2015 is more dynamic to drive. Ford Ranger 2015 engine produces 17 HP more power than Ford Ranger 2010, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Ford Ranger 2010. Thanks to more power Ford Ranger 2015 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 10.4 | |
|
The Ford Ranger 2015 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger 2015 consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger 2010, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger 2015 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger 2015 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 237 mm (9.3 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger 2015 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Ford Ranger 2015 is larger. Ford Ranger 2015 is 28 cm longer than the Ford Ranger 2010, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger 2015 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.6 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 800 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |