Ford Ranger 2015 vs Ford Ranger 2006

 
Ford Ranger
2015 - 2018
Ford Ranger
2006 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 160 HP143 HP
Torque: 385 NM330 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 seconds12 seconds
Ford Ranger 2015 is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Ranger 2015 engine produces 17 HP more power than Ford Ranger 2006, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Ford Ranger 2006. Thanks to more power Ford Ranger 2015 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.18.9
Real fuel consumption: 8.9 l/100km9.5 l/100km
The Ford Ranger 2015 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Ranger 2015 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger 2006, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger 2015 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger 2015 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger 2006.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1120 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
1210 km on highway800 km on highway
890 km with real consumption660 km with real consumption
Ford Ranger 2015 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 237 mm (9.3 inches)205 mm (8.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger 2015 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 5.36 m5.08 m
Width: 1.86 m1.81 m
Height: 1.82 m1.76 m
Ford Ranger 2015 is larger.
Ford Ranger 2015 is 29 cm longer than the Ford Ranger 2006, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger 2015 is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data1500 litres
Turning diameter: no data13 meters
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight: 3`200 kg3`020 kg
Net weight:2`102 kg1`955 kg
Load capacity:1`098 kg1`065 kg
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 23 8006800
Pros and Cons: Ford Ranger has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • electric power steering
Ford Ranger has
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv