Ford Ranger 2015 vs Ford Ranger 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Ford Ranger 2006 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger 2015 engine produces 13 HP less power than Ford Ranger 2006, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger 2015 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 8.9 | |
|
The Ford Ranger 2015 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger 2015 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger 2006, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger 2015 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1230 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger 2015 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 237 mm (9.3 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger 2015 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Ford Ranger 2015 is larger. Ford Ranger 2015 is 29 cm longer than the Ford Ranger 2006, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger 2015 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 3`020 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`014 kg | 1`955 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`186 kg | 1`065 kg | |
| Ford Ranger 2015 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Ford Ranger 2006. Therefore, Ford Ranger 2015 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 800 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |