Ford Ranger 2006 vs Nissan Navara 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.3 - 4.0 | 2.5 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 207 HP | 174 - 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 209 - 380 NM | 385 - 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 14.7 seconds | 11.4 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 - 10.4 | 8.5 - 13.8 | |
|
On average, Ford Ranger equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 22 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 13.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`020 | ~ 3`000 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Navara has
| |