Ford Ranger 2006 vs Ford Ranger 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.3 - 4.0 | 2.3 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 207 HP | 84 - 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 209 - 380 NM | 195 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 14.7 seconds | 12.5 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 - 10.4 | 8.9 - 10.2 | |
|
On average, Ford Ranger 2006 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger 2006. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 203 - 205 mm (8 - 8.1 inches) | 203 - 205 mm (8 - 8.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Ford Ranger 2006 is 8 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger 2006, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger 2006 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Ranger 2006, which means Ford Ranger 2006 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`020 | ~ 2`986 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Ranger has
| |