Ford Ranger 2006 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.3 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.2 - 4.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 207 HP | 114 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 209 - 380 NM | 180 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 14.7 seconds | 10.1 - 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 - 10.4 | 13.7 - 14.3 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 38 cm longer than the Chevrolet Blazer, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 1903 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1920 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Ranger has 403 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Blazer. This could mean that the Ford Ranger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Blazer, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`020 | ~ 2`196 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |