Ford Ranger 2015 vs Isuzu D-Max 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Ranger is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Isuzu D-Max can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford Ranger also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 | 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 200 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 - 470 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 14.9 seconds | 12.7 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 8.7 | 7.3 - 8.4 | |
|
On average, Ford Ranger equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger is 7 cm longer than the Isuzu D-Max, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`200 | ~ 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 35 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
| |