Ford Ranger 2015 vs Ford Ranger 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 (diesel) | 2.3 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with diesel engines. Ford Ranger 2006 is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 200 HP | 143 - 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 - 470 NM | 209 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 14.9 seconds | 12 - 14.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 8.9 | 8.9 - 10.4 | |
|
On average, Ford Ranger 2015 equipped with diesel engines consume 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger 2006. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 232 - 237 mm (9.1 - 9.3 inches) | 203 - 205 mm (8 - 8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger 2015 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.73 m | |
| Ford Ranger 2015 is 36 cm longer than the Ford Ranger 2006, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger 2015 is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`200 kg | ~ 3`020 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`997 kg | ~ 1`879 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 1`203 kg | ~ 1`141 kg | |
| Ford Ranger 2015 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 5 procentiem more than Ford Ranger 2006. Therefore, Ford Ranger 2015 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 800 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |