Ford Mustang 2014 vs Chevrolet Impala 2013
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 309 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 125 HP more power than Chevrolet Impala, whereas torque is 174 NM more than Chevrolet Impala. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Impala) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.50 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 33 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Impala, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 124 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |