Ford Mustang 2009 vs Jaguar XK 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 5.4 | 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 540 - 550 HP | 385 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 691 NM | 515 - 625 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 seconds | 4.8 - 5.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.1 - 13.9 | 11.2 - 12.3 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is smaller, but higher. Ford Mustang is 2 cm shorter than the Jaguar XK, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mustang is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 379 litres | 300 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Mustang has 79 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XK. The Jaguar XK may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.1 metres more than that of the Jaguar XK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`856 | ~ 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Jaguar XK has
| |