Ford Maverick 2004 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Ford Maverick) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Toyota RAV4) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Maverick engine produces 14 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 110 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Despite the higher power, Ford Maverick reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Maverick consumes 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Maverick could require 675 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Maverick consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Ford Maverick 2000: The AWD system typically directs the majority of the engine`s power to the front wheels. If slippage is detected at the front, power is quickly redirected to the rear wheels via a Rotary Blade Coupling, which can transfer up to 100% of the power to rear axis. Switching the system from `Auto` to `On` locks the front and rear axles at a 50/50 split and reduces the reaction time needed to engage the rear wheels through an integrated bypass clutch. Toyota RAV4 2006: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually with a button on the console. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2006 2.2 engine: The AD-series turbo diesel engines were introduced in Toyota vehicles in 2005 and remained in production until 2018. The first model was a 2.2-liter engine, followed by a 2.0-liter version. Both engines share an 86 mm ... More about Toyota RAV4 2006 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Ford Maverick is larger. Ford Maverick is 4 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Maverick is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 985 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1470 litres | |
|
Ford Maverick has more luggage capacity. Ford Maverick has 399 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`978 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Maverick has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |