Ford Kuga 2013 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Kuga is more dynamic to drive. Ford Kuga engine produces 33 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Kuga consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 970 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Ford Kuga is larger. Ford Kuga is 15 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1568 litres | 1585 litres | |
| Ford Kuga has 26 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 17 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Ford Kuga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |