Ford Kuga 2019 vs Subaru Forester 2021

 
Ford Kuga
2019 - 2022
Subaru Forester
2021 - 2024
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Diesel2.5 Petrol
Diesel (Ford Kuga) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Subaru Forester) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."

Performance

Power: 120 HP182 HP
Torque: 300 NM239 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 secondsn/a seconds
Ford Kuga engine produces 62 HP less power than Subaru Forester, but torque is 61 NM more than Subaru Forester.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.69.0
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Kuga consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 510 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 960 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
1280 km on highway750 km on highway
Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 160 mm (6.3 inches)234 mm (9.2 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru Forester can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.61 m4.64 m
Width: 1.88 m1.83 m
Height: 1.68 m1.75 m
Ford Kuga is 3 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 435 litres762 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1534 litres2101 litres
Subaru Forester has more luggage space.
Ford Kuga has 327 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Forester. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Forester (by 567 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.6 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Ford Kuga can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`110 kgno data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 17 20026 000
Pros and Cons: Ford Kuga has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Subaru Forester has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv