Ford Kuga 2019 vs Jeep Cherokee 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Ford Kuga) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Jeep Cherokee) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 270 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Kuga engine produces 150 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 9.0 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Kuga consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 510 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga is 1 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 448 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1534 litres | 1555 litres | |
| Ford Kuga has 13 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 21 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`110 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |
