Ford Kuga 2019 vs Honda CR-V 2017

 
Ford Kuga
2019 - 2022
Honda CR-V
2017 - 2019
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 120 HP160 HP
Torque: 300 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds9.6 seconds
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Kuga engine produces 40 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.64.9
Ford Kuga consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 105 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres53 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 960 km in combined cycle1080 km in combined cycle
1280 km on highway1120 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Honda CR-V 2017: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected.

Ground clearance: 160 mm (6.3 inches)165 mm (6.5 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.61 m4.59 m
Width: 1.88 m1.85 m
Height: 1.68 m1.68 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga is 3 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 435 litres497 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1534 litres1110 litres
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 424 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.4 meters
Gross weight: 2`110 kg2`170 kg
Net weight:1`524 kg1`700 kg
Load capacity:586 kg470 kg
Ford Kuga load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem more than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Ford Kuga is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 17 20016 400
Pros and Cons: Ford Kuga has
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Honda CR-V has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv