Ford Kuga 2019 vs Opel Grandland 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Ford Kuga engine produces 27 HP less power than Opel Grandland, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Opel Grandland. Due to the lower power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.9 | |
| Ford Kuga consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Grandland, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 188 mm (7.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Opel Grandland can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Opel Grandland version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.61 m | |
| Ford Kuga is 14 cm longer than the Opel Grandland, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Kuga is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 514 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1534 litres | 1652 litres | |
|
Opel Grandland has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Grandland (by 118 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.3 metres more than that of the Opel Grandland. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`155 kg | 2`090 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`605 kg | 1`500 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 550 kg | 590 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Opel Grandland has
| |