Ford Kuga 2019 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Kuga is more dynamic to drive. Ford Kuga engine produces 34 HP more power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Thanks to more power Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.4 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Kuga consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-30 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-30 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eight 4x4 versions of Mazda CX-30 2019 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Ford Kuga is larger. Ford Kuga is 22 cm longer than the Mazda CX-30, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1534 litres | 1406 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`155 kg | 1`949 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`605 kg | 1`344 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 550 kg | 605 kg | |
| Ford Kuga load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than Mazda CX-30. Therefore, Mazda CX-30 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |