Ford Kuga 2019 vs Jeep Cherokee 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Ford Kuga) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Jeep Cherokee) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 270 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Kuga engine produces 80 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga is 1 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 1401 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1534 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Ford Kuga has 966 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`245 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 000 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |