Ford Kuga 2020 vs Honda CR-V 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 243 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Kuga engine produces 38 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 43 NM less than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 53 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 208 mm (8.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda CR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga is 3 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1481 litres | 1110 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Ford Kuga has 92 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 371 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |