Ford Kuga 2020 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 258 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Kuga engine produces 42 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 58 NM less than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 56 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-5 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Mazda CX-5 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Ford Kuga is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Kuga is 6 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1481 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 24 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |