Ford Kuga 2020 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Kuga engine produces 3 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, but torque is 4 NM more than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 56 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-5 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Mazda CX-5 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2017 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Ford Kuga is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Kuga is 6 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1481 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Kuga has 72 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 139 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 23 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |