Ford Kuga 2019 vs Opel Grandland 2017

 
Ford Kuga
2019 -
Opel Grandland
2017 - 2020
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Hybrid2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 152 HP177 HP
Torque: 200 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds9.5 seconds
Ford Kuga engine produces 25 HP less power than Opel Grandland, whereas torque is 200 NM less than Opel Grandland. Despite less power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 1.24.9
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Kuga consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Grandland, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 555 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 42 litres53 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 3500 km in combined cycle1080 km in combined cycle
Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 160 mm (6.3 inches)188 mm (7.4 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Opel Grandland can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Opel Grandland version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.61 m4.48 m
Width: 1.88 m1.91 m
Height: 1.68 m1.61 m
Ford Kuga is 14 cm longer than the Opel Grandland, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Kuga is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 411 litres514 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1481 litres1652 litres
Opel Grandland has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Ford Kuga has 103 litres less trunk space than the Opel Grandland. This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Grandland (by 171 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.3 metres more than that of the Opel Grandland.
Gross weight (kg): 2`3202`090
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 21 800no data
Pros and Cons: Ford Kuga has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Opel Grandland has
  • more power
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv