Ford Kuga 2019 vs Opel Grandland 2017
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Hybrid | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Ford Kuga) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Opel Grandland), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Ford Kuga engine produces 25 HP less power than Opel Grandland, whereas torque is 200 NM less than Opel Grandland. Despite less power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.2 l/100km + 16.4 kWh/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 7.10 € | 9.10 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWhDiesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 188 mm (7.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Opel Grandland can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Opel Grandland version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.61 m | |
| Ford Kuga is 14 cm longer than the Opel Grandland, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Kuga is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 411 litres | 514 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1481 litres | 1652 litres | |
|
Opel Grandland has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Grandland (by 171 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.3 metres more than that of the Opel Grandland. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`320 kg | 2`090 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`769 kg | 1`500 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 551 kg | 590 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Opel Grandland has
| |