Ford Kuga 2019 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Hybrid | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Ford Kuga) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Mazda CX-30) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 189 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 252 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Kuga engine produces 37 HP less power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Mazda CX-30. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.2 | 6.4 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Kuga consumes 5.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 780 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 3500 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-30 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-30 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eight 4x4 versions of Mazda CX-30 2019 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Ford Kuga is larger. Ford Kuga is 22 cm longer than the Mazda CX-30, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 411 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1481 litres | 1406 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Ford Kuga has 19 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 75 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`320 | 1`939 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 23 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |