Ford Kuga 2019 vs Ford Escape 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Hybrid | 2.5 Hybrid | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Kuga engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Escape, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Ford Escape. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.2 | 5.7 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Kuga consumes 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escape, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 675 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga is 3 cm longer than the Ford Escape, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 411 litres | 869 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1481 litres | 1722 litres | |
|
Ford Escape has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Escape (by 241 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`320 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Ford Escape has
| |