Ford F150 2003 vs Land Rover Discovery 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Ford F150) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Discovery) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 495 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 163 HP more power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 195 NM more than Land Rover Discovery. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.7 | 9.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 5.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 795 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 114 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
|
Land Rover Discovery 2002: All wheels are powered permanently, has a center differential. Full time 4WD can be used both on and off road. Transfer cases in most have two modes (low and high), which allows the use of low speed range in harsh conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.68 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger, but slightly lower. Ford F150 is 98 cm longer than the Land Rover Discovery, 12 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1970 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.7 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 1.8 metres more than that of the Land Rover Discovery, which means Ford F150 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`198 kg | 2`750 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`395 kg | 2`020 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 803 kg | 730 kg | |
| Ford F150 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem more than Land Rover Discovery. Therefore, Ford F150 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |