Ford F150 2014 vs Ford Ranger 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 365 HP | 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 570 NM | 323 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 158 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 247 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 64 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.06 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.68 m | |
| Ford F150 is 109 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford F150 is 24 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1495 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2200 litres | no data | |
| Ford F150 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 000 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |