Ford Explorer 2010 vs Ford Ranger 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 345 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Ford Explorer is more dynamic to drive. Ford Explorer engine produces 106 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Ford Explorer reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 8.9 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Explorer consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Explorer could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
| Ford Explorer is 7 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 20 cm wider, while the height of Ford Explorer is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 595 litres | 1500 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage space. Ford Explorer has 905 litres less trunk space than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |