Ford Escape 2020 vs Ford Kuga 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Hybrid | 2.5 Hybrid | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 162 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Ford Escape engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Ford Kuga. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 1.2 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Escape consumes 4.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Escape could require 705 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Escape is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 869 litres | 411 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1722 litres | 1481 litres | |
|
Ford Escape has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Ford Kuga may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Escape (by 241 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`320 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |
