Ford Escape 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 366 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Ford Escape engine produces 90 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 156 NM more than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 6.3 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Escape consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Escape could require 465 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Escape is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Escape is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 971 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1920 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Ford Escape has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Escape has 508 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Escape (by 300 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escape is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Ford Escape can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |