Ford EcoSport 2017 vs Peugeot 2008 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 10 HP less power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Peugeot 2008. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 4.7 | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford EcoSport consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Peugeot 2008 2013 1.2 engine: Because the timing belt is placed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to axial play in the crankshaft. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.56 m | |
| Ford EcoSport is 6 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1145 litres | 1172 litres | |
|
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage space. Ford EcoSport has 30 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 2008 (by 27 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.6 metres less than that of the Peugeot 2008, which means Ford EcoSport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`730 kg | 1`656 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`274 kg | 1`090 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 456 kg | 566 kg | |
| Ford EcoSport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem less than Peugeot 2008. Therefore, Peugeot 2008 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Ford EcoSport has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 225 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport, so Ford EcoSport quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |