Ford EcoSport 2017 vs Peugeot 2008 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 15 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, but torque is 35 NM less than Peugeot 2008. Despite the higher power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.7 | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford EcoSport consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 2008 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo, Ford C-Max | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Opel Combo, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 2008 2013 1.2 engine: Because the timing belt is placed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to axial play in the crankshaft. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.56 m | |
| Ford EcoSport is 6 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 334 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1172 litres | |
| Ford EcoSport has 16 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 66 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.6 metres less than that of the Peugeot 2008, which means Ford EcoSport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`656 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Ford EcoSport has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 225 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport, so Ford EcoSport quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |