Ford EcoSport 2012 vs Toyota RAV4 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 10 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.8 | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford EcoSport consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter gasoline engine debuted in 2000 as a replacement for the 3S-FE. It features an aluminum block with cast-iron liners and an open cooling jacket, an aluminum 16-valve DOHC cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, and a chain-driven timing system. Most versions of ... More about Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Ford EcoSport is smaller. Ford EcoSport is 25 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1150 litres | |
| Ford EcoSport has 67 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 88 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`825 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |