Ford B-Max 2012 vs Citroen C3 Picasso 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 - 120 HP | 92 - 115 HP | |
Torque: | 125 - 215 NM | 135 - 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 15.1 seconds | 10.7 - 15.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 6.4 | 3.8 - 6.3 | |
Ford B-Max petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen C3 Picasso. On average, Ford B-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3 Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.08 m | 4.10 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.63 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Ford B-Max is 2 cm shorter than the Citroen C3 Picasso, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford B-Max is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 318 litres | 385 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1386 litres | 1506 litres | |
Citroen C3 Picasso has more luggage space. Ford B-Max has 67 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3 Picasso. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 Picasso (by 120 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford B-Max is 0.1 metres less than that of the Citroen C3 Picasso. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`779 | ~ 1`776 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 7200 | 4800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford B-Max has
|
Citroen C3 Picasso has
| |