Fiat Croma 2005 vs Smart ForFour 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.4 | 1.1 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 200 HP | 64 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 400 NM | 92 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 11.3 seconds | 6.9 - 15.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 9.7 | 4.6 - 6.8 | |
|
Fiat Croma petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Smart ForFour. On average, Fiat Croma equipped with diesel engines consume 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForFour. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 3.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 101 cm longer than the Smart ForFour, 10 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 268 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 910 litres | |
|
Fiat Croma has more luggage capacity. Fiat Croma has 232 litres more trunk space than the Smart ForFour. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.4 metres more than that of the Smart ForFour, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`993 | ~ 1`450 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Smart ForFour has
| |