Fiat Croma 2008 vs Fiat Bravo 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.4 | 1.4 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 200 HP | 90 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 400 NM | 128 - 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 11 seconds | 8.5 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 9.3 | 5.3 - 6.7 | |
|
Fiat Croma petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Fiat Bravo. On average, Fiat Croma equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.50 m | |
| Fiat Croma is 44 cm longer than the Fiat Bravo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Croma is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 400 litres | |
|
Fiat Croma has more luggage capacity. Fiat Croma has 100 litres more trunk space than the Fiat Bravo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.5 metres more than that of the Fiat Bravo, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`053 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |