Fiat Bravo 2010 vs Lexus CT 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 206 NM | 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Fiat Bravo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Bravo engine produces 21 HP more power than Lexus CT, whereas torque is 64 NM more than Lexus CT. Thanks to more power Fiat Bravo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Lexus CT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Bravo consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus CT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Bravo could require 375 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Bravo consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus CT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Lexus CT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus CT engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Fiat Grande Punto, Alfa Romeo Giulietta, Alfa Romeo MiTo | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota C-HR | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus CT might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Lexus CT 2011 1.8 engine: The Toyota 2ZR-FXE is a 1.8-liter gasoline engine produced since 2009 and designed specifically for Toyota hybrid powertrains. It is based on the conventional 2ZR-FE but adapted for hybrid operation, prioritizing efficiency rather than outright performance. The engine is very economical and, with ... More about Lexus CT 2011 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Bravo is 2 cm longer than the Lexus CT, 3 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Bravo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 345 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1175 litres | 985 litres | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Bravo has 55 litres more trunk space than the Lexus CT. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Fiat Bravo (by 190 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`785 kg | 1`845 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`260 kg | 1`410 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 525 kg | 435 kg | |
| Fiat Bravo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem more than Lexus CT. Therefore, Fiat Bravo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Lexus CT has
| |