Fiat Bravo 2007 vs Audi A3 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Fiat Bravo
2007 - 2010
Audi A3
2004 - 2008
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Fiat Bravo is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi A3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.4 - 1.91.4 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 90 - 150 HP102 - 250 HP
Torque: 128 - 305 NM148 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 - 12.5 seconds6.3 - 13.2 seconds
In general, Audi A3 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Fiat Bravo. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.3 - 6.75.1 - 10.6
Fiat Bravo petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi A3. On average, Fiat Bravo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.34 m4.29 m
Width: 1.79 m1.76 m
Height: 1.50 m1.42 m
Fiat Bravo is larger.
Fiat Bravo is 5 cm longer than the Audi A3, 3 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Bravo is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 400 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1175 litres1120 litres
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity.
Fiat Bravo has 30 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Fiat Bravo (by 55 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A3.
Gross weight: ~ 1`800 kg~ 1`944 kg
Net weight:~ 1`290 kg~ 1`375 kg
Load capacity:~ 510 kg~ 569 kg
Fiat Bravo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Audi A3. Therefore, Audi A3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 22002800
Pros and Cons: Fiat Bravo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Audi A3 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv