Dodge Journey 2008 vs Ford Ranger 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Dodge Journey engine produces 3 HP less power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford Ranger. Despite less power, Dodge Journey reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Dodge Journey is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dodge Journey consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Dodge Journey over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dodge Journey consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Dodge Journey gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.76 m | |
| Dodge Journey is 19 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 3 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Journey is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 127 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 127 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 816 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2117 litres | no data | |
| In 5-seat version Ford Ranger has more luggage space (by 684 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Journey is 1.3 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Dodge Journey can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`480 | 3`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Journey has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |