Dacia Sandero 2008 vs Dacia Logan 2008
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Dacia Logan is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Sandero engine produces 18 HP less power than Dacia Logan, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Dacia Logan. Due to the lower power, Dacia Sandero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Sandero is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Dacia Sandero consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Sandero could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Dacia Sandero consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Dokker, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Dacia Lodgy | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Nissan Almera, Renault Kangoo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Sandero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.52 m | |
| Dacia Sandero is 27 cm shorter than the Dacia Logan, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | no data | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage space. Dacia Sandero has 190 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`536 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Dacia Sandero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Dacia Sandero, so Dacia Sandero quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Sandero has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |