Dacia Logan 2008 vs Dacia Sandero 2008
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 87 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Dacia Logan is more dynamic to drive. Dacia Logan engine produces 18 HP more power than Dacia Sandero, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Dacia Sandero. Thanks to more power Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Sandero is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Dacia Logan consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Sandero, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Dacia Logan consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Sandero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 28 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Dacia Duster, Renault Megane, Nissan Almera, Renault Kangoo | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Dokker, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Dacia Lodgy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Sandero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Dacia Logan 2008 1.6 engine: The Renault K4M 1.6 16V is one of the most durable and well-known engines in its class. It is simple, widely used, and generally not demanding, with many well-maintained examples reaching 400,000–500,000 km. The engine is not especially modern or economical by current standards, but it has a ... More about Dacia Logan 2008 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
| Dacia Logan is 27 cm longer than the Dacia Sandero, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1200 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage capacity. Dacia Logan has 190 litres more trunk space than the Dacia Sandero. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`600 kg | 1`536 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`060 kg | 1`111 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 540 kg | 425 kg | |
| Dacia Logan load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Dacia Sandero. Therefore, Dacia Logan is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Dacia Sandero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Dacia Sandero, so Dacia Sandero quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Dacia Sandero has
| |