Dacia Logan 2008 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 131 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Dacia Logan is more dynamic to drive. Dacia Logan engine produces 11 HP more power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Thanks to more power Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Logan consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Logan could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Logan consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Nissan Almera, Renault Kangoo | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Lacetti, Chevrolet Kalos | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chevrolet Aveo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dacia Logan is 2 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Aveo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Dacia Logan is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 375 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Dacia Logan has 135 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. The Chevrolet Aveo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Logan is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Dacia Logan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`535 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Chevrolet Aveo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Chevrolet Aveo, so Chevrolet Aveo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |