Dacia Logan 2016 vs Dacia Logan 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 0.9 - 1.5 | 0.9 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 101 HP | 75 - 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 97 - 220 NM | 104 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 - 15.1 seconds | 11 - 15.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 - 5.0 | 3.6 - 7.6 | |
|
Dacia Logan 2016 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Dacia Logan 2012. On average, Dacia Logan 2016 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan 2012. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 - 145 mm (5.1 - 5.7 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Logan 2012 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dacia Logan 2016 and Dacia Logan 2012 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1257 litres | 1250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`576 | ~ 1`561 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |