Dacia Duster 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Duster engine produces 45 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 44 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Dacia Duster reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Duster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Duster consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Dacia Duster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Duster consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Megane, Nissan Almera, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo | Used also on Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Duster might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.68 m | |
| Dacia Duster is 21 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Dacia Duster is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 475 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1604 litres | 955 litres | |
| Dacia Duster has 81 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Duster (by 649 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Duster is 1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Dacia Duster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`710 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Duster has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 5000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Duster has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |