Dacia Dokker 2016 vs Ford Tourneo 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Dacia Dokker is more dynamic to drive. Dacia Dokker engine produces 31 HP more power than Ford Tourneo, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Ford Tourneo. Thanks to more power Dacia Dokker reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Tourneo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Dokker consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Dokker could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Dokker consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Tourneo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford C-Max, Ford Fiesta, Ford B-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Dacia Dokker engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Dokker 2016 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Dacia Dokker is smaller. Dacia Dokker is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Tourneo, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Dokker is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 800 litres | 1029 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Tourneo has more luggage space. Dacia Dokker has 229 litres less trunk space than the Ford Tourneo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Dokker is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Tourneo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 25 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Dokker has
|
Ford Tourneo has
| |