Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Toyota RAV4 2003

 
Citroen Xsara
2003 - 2005
Toyota RAV4
2003 - 2006
Body: Estate car / wagonCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 90 HP116 HP
Torque: 205 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds12.1 seconds
Citroen Xsara engine produces 26 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Despite less power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.57.1
Real fuel consumption: 5.9 l/100km7.9 l/100km
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen Xsara consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres57 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
1250 km on highway930 km on highway
910 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Toyota RAV4 2003: Toyota has full-time all wheel drive with viscous coupling locking center differential and can have optional Torsen limited-slip rear differential.

Engines

Engine production duration: 7 years8 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 206, Citroen C5, Peugeot 306Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Corolla Verso
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Citroen Xsara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics. One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ...  More about Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.26 m
Width: 1.70 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.72 m
Citroen Xsara is 11 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 30 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data400 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1150 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`930
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

high
Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8003200
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Toyota RAV4 has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv