Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Toyota RAV4 2003

 
Citroen Xsara
2003 - 2004
Toyota RAV4
2003 - 2006
Body: Estate car / wagonCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 75 HP125 HP
Torque: 120 NM161 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.2 seconds12.2 seconds
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Xsara engine produces 50 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.77.4
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km7.9 l/100km
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen Xsara consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres57 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway910 km on highway
790 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 13 years12 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen BerlingoInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Corolla Verso
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara might be a better choice in this respect.
Toyota RAV4 2003 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ...  More about Toyota RAV4 2003 1.8 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.26 m
Width: 1.70 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.70 m
Citroen Xsara is 11 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 28 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data400 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1150 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`730
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

high
Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8003200
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Toyota RAV4 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv